Just a moment...

⚠✕
❮ Top
☎ Help
🚀 New: Section-Wise Filter ✕

1. Search Case laws by Section / Act / Rule — now available beyond Income Tax. GST and Other Laws Available

2. New: “In Favour Of” filter added in Case Laws.

Try both these filters in Case Laws →

☰
×

By creating an account you can:

Logo TaxTMI
>
Call Us / Help / Feedback✕

Contact Us At :

✉ E-mail: [email protected]

✆ Call / WhatsApp at: +91 99117 96707

For more information, Check Contact Us

FAQs :

To know Frequently Asked Questions, Check FAQs

Most Asked Video Tutorials :

For more tutorials, Check Video Tutorials

Submit Feedback/Suggestion :

Email :
Please provide your email address so we can follow up on your feedback.
Category :
Description :
Min 15 characters0/2000
TMI Blog
Home / RSS
PrevPreviousNextNext

1998 (10) TMI 174

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....the Respondent. [Order per : Jyoti Balasundaram, Member (J)]. - Vide Stay Order No. 75/98-C, dated 2-7-1998, the applicants herein was directed to deposit Rs. 3 lakhs towards the duty demand of Rs. 14.56 lakhs and the requirement of predeposit of balance duty and the penalty was dispensed with and recovery stayed. Learned Counsel, Shri Ashuthosh Upadhyay, submits that the financial position of ....

PrevPreviousNextNext