Loading...

⚠ โœ•
❮ Top
☎ Help
Draft upto 3 replies to a
tax notice โ€” FREE ๐ŸŽ‰ โœ•

150 credits ยท 30 days

โ€ข Basic Search โ†’ 1 Credit
โ€ข Advanced Search โ†’ 3 Credits
โ€ข Drafter โ†’ 20 to extract + 25 per issue
(โ‰ˆ upto 2-3 drafts on us)

Already used our earlier 20-Credit Demo?
You are still eligible for this new 150-Credit Demo.

Activate your FREE Demo โ†’
☰
×

By creating an account you can:

Logo TaxTMI
Call Us / Help / Feedbackโœ•

Contact Us At :

✉ E-mail: [email protected]

✆ Call / WhatsApp at: +91 99117 96707

For more information, Check Contact Us

FAQs :

To know Frequently Asked Questions, Check FAQs

Most Asked Video Tutorials :

For more tutorials, Check Video Tutorials

Submit Feedback/Suggestion :

Email :
Please provide your email address so we can follow up on your feedback.
Category :
Description :
Min 15 characters 0/2000
TMI Blog
Home / TMI Blogs / RSS

1998 (12) TMI 149

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

.... H.K. Jain, SDR, for the Respondent. [Order per : A.C.C. Unni, Member (J)]. - These are three Appeals filed by the above mentioned appellants against two orders passed by Collector (Appeals) dated 29-11-1991 and another order passed by Additional Collector dated 28-8-1991. The issue in all these three Appeals being common, they were taken up together for hearing. 2. When the matter w....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....hat there is a certificate dated December, 1979 given by the General Manager, District Industries Centre, Nadiad, certifying that M/s. Comet Paints Ltd., Anand is a small scale industrial unit bearing the Registration No. 04-10-220/PMT-SSI, dated 19-6-1976. From the records of Appeal No. 864/92-C (Annexure E to Appeal) it appears that the appellants had filed a copy of the agreement dated 26th Jun....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....had rightly denied the benefit of Notification 175/86 in the absence of any proof to show that brand name owner was a SSI and it was still in existence or that they had not themselves crossed the clearance limit for continuing to be a beneficiary of Notification 175/86. He referred to the observation made by the Addl. Collector in the impugned order that M/s. Comet Paints Ltd. had ceased the produ....