1998 (11) TMI 197

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....e Respondent. [Order per : S.L. Peeran, Member (J)]. - This is an appeal dated 30-11-1990 confirming the enhancement of valuation of the goods from Rs. 66,233/- to Rs. 6,64,530/- in terms of Customs Act, 1962 read with Section 14(1) and 14(1)(a) of the Customs Act. The goods were confiscated and released on redemption fine of Rs. 1.5 lacs under Section 125 of the Customs Act. Personal penalt....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....uch as they had typed as HK 3.5 per gross instead of HK 3.5 per 10 gross. To this effect the appellant had produced a clarificatory letter from the suppliers and had also filed evidence in support of their contentions. It is the contention of the appellants that the Commissioner has noted all the details and the points raised by them in the impugned order. However, he has not taken the evidence in....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....ow cause notice. 4. On a careful consideration of the record and the allegation made in the show cause notice, it is seen that the allegation is based on the wrong declaration filed by mistake by the supplier. Subsequent evidence was produced to show that the manufacture of the goods had furnished correct value. The evidence produced has not been taking into consideration by the Commission....