1998 (8) TMI 176

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

.... SDR, for the Respondents. [Order per : Jyoti Balasundaram, Member (J)]. -  The appellants are aggrieved by the order of the Collector of Central Excise (Appeals), Mumbai confirming the order of the Assistant Collector who has approved classification lists filed by the assessees for products such as "Ampicillin for oral suspension BP", "Chloramphenicol for oral suspension BP", etc. unde....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....as their brand name so as to hold that their products are P or P medicines is not acceptable, since this triangle does not indicate any relationship between the appellants and the goods in question. The appellants' submission that there is no difference in the labels of the products covered by the present impugned order and those considered by the Collector (Appeals) in his order dated 25-6-1991 w....