1998 (7) TMI 207

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....d specific gravity (used for formulation processes and testing of cells used in stationary batteries) and a quantity of 61,379.90 litres of solid KOH and LiOH (Lithium Hydroxide) despatched along with the stationary batteries manufactured by the appellants to their customers, on the ground that liquid electrolyte is an excisable commodity attracting 15% ad valorem of Special Excise duty under sub-heading 38.23 of the Schedule to the CETA, 1985, and not entitled to the benefit of exemption under Notification No. 217/86-C.E., dated 2-3-1986 since the stationary batteries for which the liquid electrolyte was used were exempt from duty under Notification No. 68/86-C.E., dated 10-2-1986. The Adjudicating authority has also imposed a penalty of R....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

.... liquid form and that the department has failed to discharge the burden of establishing the marketability of the disputed products. Lastly, he submits that the demand is barred by limitation - the show cause notice dated 3-2-1993 covering the period from 14-1-1988 to 7-8-1992 is beyond the period of six months from the relevant date and the extended period of limitation is not applicable since the appellants were under a bona fide belief, based upon the 1988 Circular cited above that the mixing of electrolyte in solid form with water does not amount to manufacture of a new excisable commodity. He therefore, prays for setting aside the duty demand and the penalty. 4. The learned DR draws our attention to the finding in the impugned o....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....cided by the adjudicating authority. 6. Hawley's Condensed Chemical Dictionary 11th Edition shows that Potassium Hydroxide and Lithium Hydroxide are electrolytes for storage battery purposes (pages 956 and 709). The contention of the appellants that mixing with water is only for the purpose of dissolving of the solid flakes of KOH and LiOH has not been rebutted by the Revenue. The Collector's finding on excisability contained in para 18 of the impugned order, is based entirely upon the statements of General Manager and the Senior Works Manager of the appellants and there is no independent reasoning on how the mixing results in a distinct commercial commodity having a different name, character and use from the solid form so as to sat....