Loading...

⚠ โœ•
❮ Top
☎ Help
Draft upto 3 replies to a
tax notice โ€” FREE ๐ŸŽ‰ โœ•

150 credits ยท 30 days

โ€ข Basic Search โ†’ 1 Credit
โ€ข Advanced Search โ†’ 3 Credits
โ€ข Drafter โ†’ 20 to extract + 25 per issue
(โ‰ˆ upto 2-3 drafts on us)

Already used our earlier 20-Credit Demo?
You are still eligible for this new 150-Credit Demo.

Activate your FREE Demo โ†’
☰
×

By creating an account you can:

Logo TaxTMI
Call Us / Help / Feedbackโœ•

Contact Us At :

✉ E-mail: [email protected]

✆ Call / WhatsApp at: +91 99117 96707

For more information, Check Contact Us

FAQs :

To know Frequently Asked Questions, Check FAQs

Most Asked Video Tutorials :

For more tutorials, Check Video Tutorials

Submit Feedback/Suggestion :

Email :
Please provide your email address so we can follow up on your feedback.
Category :
Description :
Min 15 characters 0/2000
TMI Blog
Home / TMI Blogs / RSS

1998 (6) TMI 160

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

.... : K. Sankararaman, Member (T)]. -  This is an appeal filed by the Collector of Customs, Madras against the Order-in-Original dated 27-11-1989 passed by the Additional Collector of Customs, Madras. The appeal has been filed as directed by Central Board of Excise & Customs vide their Order No. 93-R dated 4-10-1990 in exercise of the review powers under Section 129D(1) of Customs Act. The po....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

.... stated to be not legal and proper leading to the filing of the present appeal. 2. The notice of hearing sent to the respondent at the address indicated in the impugned order passed by the Additional Collector has been returned by the postal authorities with their remark that there is no such company at the address shown. While we agree that adjudicating authority should have considered co....