Loading...

⚠ โœ•
❮ Top
☎ Help
Draft upto 3 replies to a
tax notice โ€” FREE ๐ŸŽ‰ โœ•

150 credits ยท 30 days

โ€ข Basic Search โ†’ 1 Credit
โ€ข Advanced Search โ†’ 3 Credits
โ€ข Drafter โ†’ 20 to extract + 25 per issue
(โ‰ˆ upto 2-3 drafts on us)

Already used our earlier 20-Credit Demo?
You are still eligible for this new 150-Credit Demo.

Activate your FREE Demo โ†’
☰
×

By creating an account you can:

Logo TaxTMI
Call Us / Help / Feedbackโœ•

Contact Us At :

✉ E-mail: [email protected]

✆ Call / WhatsApp at: +91 99117 96707

For more information, Check Contact Us

FAQs :

To know Frequently Asked Questions, Check FAQs

Most Asked Video Tutorials :

For more tutorials, Check Video Tutorials

Submit Feedback/Suggestion :

Email :
Please provide your email address so we can follow up on your feedback.
Category :
Description :
Min 15 characters 0/2000
TMI Blog
Home / TMI Blogs / RSS

1998 (2) TMI 263

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

.... Shri K. Srivastava, SDR, for the Respondent. [Order per : Justice U.L Bhat, President]. - Appellant, engaged in the manufacture of "Absorbent Cotton" falling under Chapter Heading 3004 of [CETA], 1985, was enjoying benefit of exemption under Notification No. 175/86 (limit of Rs. 15 lacs). The Notification required classification list to be filed on reaching 80% of the exemption limit and fi....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....y leviable thereon. According to the Department, the Notification covered only " surgical absorbent lint" but not " absorbent cotton" which was being manufactured by the appellant. A similar decision had been taken earlier against the present appellant who challenged the same in appeal E/4205/91-C. The Tribunal set aside the order and allowed the appeal by Final Order No. 564/97-C, dated 7-11-1997....