Loading...

⚠ โœ•
❮ Top
☎ Help
Draft upto 3 replies to a
tax notice โ€” FREE ๐ŸŽ‰ โœ•

150 credits ยท 30 days

โ€ข Basic Search โ†’ 1 Credit
โ€ข Advanced Search โ†’ 3 Credits
โ€ข Drafter โ†’ 20 to extract + 25 per issue
(โ‰ˆ upto 2-3 drafts on us)

Already used our earlier 20-Credit Demo?
You are still eligible for this new 150-Credit Demo.

Activate your FREE Demo โ†’
☰
×

By creating an account you can:

Logo TaxTMI
Call Us / Help / Feedbackโœ•

Contact Us At :

✉ E-mail: [email protected]

✆ Call / WhatsApp at: +91 99117 96707

For more information, Check Contact Us

FAQs :

To know Frequently Asked Questions, Check FAQs

Most Asked Video Tutorials :

For more tutorials, Check Video Tutorials

Submit Feedback/Suggestion :

Email :
Please provide your email address so we can follow up on your feedback.
Category :
Description :
Min 15 characters 0/2000
TMI Blog
Home / TMI Blogs / RSS

1998 (4) TMI 209

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....e Respondent. [Order per : G.R. Sharma, Member (T)]. -  The short point for determination in this Appeal is whether HDPE fabrics laminated with LDPE on both sides are classifiable under Chapter Heading 3926.90 as claimed by the Assessee or Chapter Heading 3920.38 as claimed by the Department. 2. The Assessees are manufacturing HDPE Fabrics laminated with LDPE on both sides. They....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....assification of HDPE has already been decided by the Madhya Pradesh High Court in the case of M/s. Raj Packwell Industries Ltd. [1990 (50) E.L.T. 201 (M.P.)]. The ld. Collector (Appeals) further observed that similar view was taken by the Collector (Appeals) in some other cases. He, therefore, decided the Appeal in favour of the Assessee. Against this order, the Department has filed the present ap....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....R submits that appeals against these decisions have already been filed. He, therefore, submits that the Asstt. Collector had correctly held that the product was classifiable under Chapter sub-heading 3920.38. 6. None appeared for the respondents. However, the issue being a simple one covered by the decision of Hon'ble M.P. High Court as also of this Tribunal, it was decided to proceed furt....