1998 (2) TMI 256
X X X X Extracts X X X X
X X X X Extracts X X X X
...., for the Respondent. [Order per : G.N. Srinivasan, Member (J)]. - This is an appeal filed by the appellants against the decision dated 4-10-1996 passed by the Collector of Customs (Appeals) made in Order-in-Appeal No. 720/96 BCH whereunder he had set aside the order passed by the Additional Collector of Customs, Bombay made in order dated 4-8-1993. In the Order-in-Original Additional ....
X X X X Extracts X X X X
X X X X Extracts X X X X
....wed for import by the leather industry. The appellant also stated that the Customs authorities had passed Notification No. 41/93, dated 28-2-1993 partially exempting these goods from the purview of levy of duty issued under Section 25 of the Customs Act, 1962. The appellant's argument is that if the goods are prohibited goods why the above notification is issued by the Customs Department themselve....
TaxTMI