Just a moment...

Report
FeedbackReport
Welcome to TaxTMI

We're migrating from taxmanagementindia.com to taxtmi.com and wish to make this transition convenient for you. We welcome your feedback and suggestions. Please report any errors you encounter so we can address them promptly.

Bars
Logo TaxTMI
>
×

By creating an account you can:

Feedback/Report an Error
Category :
Description :
Min 15 characters0/2000
TMI Blog
Home /

1998 (2) TMI 250

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

...., Member (T)]. - Matter called. None for the respondent. A notice had been issued to the Official Liquidator inasmuch as the respondent-Company has been wound up in terms of the Calcutta High Court's Order dated 29-11-1994. In terms of the said order (para 14 thereof), the management and assets of the respondent-Company has been handed over to Lessee R.D. Builders and Developers Ltd. (now change....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....une of over Rs. 23 crores. Although, the respondent-Company paid duty subsequently, a penalty of Rs. 1,00,000/- was imposed on the respondent-Company by the adjudicating authority. 3. The Board has, however, observed that the penalty should be enhanced. Accordingly, it has been an ordered under Section 35E of the Central Excise Act, 1944 directing the Collector to make an application before ....