Just a moment...

Top
Help
×

By creating an account you can:

Logo TaxTMI
>
Call Us / Help / Feedback

Contact Us At :

E-mail: [email protected]

Call / WhatsApp at: +91 99117 96707

For more information, Check Contact Us

FAQs :

To know Frequently Asked Questions, Check FAQs

Most Asked Video Tutorials :

For more tutorials, Check Video Tutorials

Submit Feedback/Suggestion :

Email :
Please provide your email address so we can follow up on your feedback.
Category :
Description :
Min 15 characters0/2000
TMI Blog
Home / RSS

1998 (1) TMI 218

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....riod 21-3-1989 to 23-5-1989 imported base paper weighing 4,293 Kgs. from M/s. Sandek India (P) Ltd. but it was not accounted in any statutory Central Excise record and in raw material register in Form IV and the material was issued for production of laminated sheets without issuing any issue slips and without accounting for it. The officers found that the appellant had manufactured laminated sheets therefrom and cleared the same clandestinely without payment of duty. The duty involved comes to Rs. 6,83,294.44. Statements were recorded from Shri B.M. Patel, the Excise Clerk and Power of Attorney holder of the appellant and from Shri J.T. Patel, Director of the Appellant. Shri J.T. Patel in the statement dated 27-7-1989 gave a detailed explan....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

.... no difference in the quantity produced. The Department in arriving at the quantity produced has not given full consideration to the types of waste that arose but has considered only the trimmings as waste. The ld. Counsel referred to the calculation chart at Annexure F in the appeal papers which brings out the fact that if the details of use of barrier papers is considered for base paper there will be no difference for demand for duty. It was also pointed out that the appellants are accounting for barrier paper in the Modvat account RG 23A as base paper. There is also no direct evidence of clandestine removal in this case. The ld. Counsel relied upon case law of the Tribunal reported in 1995 (76) E.L.T. 197 in which similar circumstances h....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....from the same party with related Bills of Entry being imported material. Shri B.A. Patel another Director of the appellant in his statement explained that in respect of goods received under cover of invoices only without gate passes they have not accounted for them but the payment for the base paper was made by cheque. Thereafter they were issued for production. In the statement of J.T. Patel, Director, there is a detailed explanation wherein he also mentioned that only two consignment out of the five have been accounted for in their statutory Central Excise record. But the other three consignments were entered in their ledger. He also mentioned in the statement that it was a practice to utilise barrier paper when the base paper was of very....