Just a moment...

Top
Help
×

By creating an account you can:

Logo TaxTMI
Call Us / Help / Feedback

Contact Us At :

E-mail: [email protected]

Call / WhatsApp at: +91 99117 96707

For more information, Check Contact Us

FAQs :

To know Frequently Asked Questions, Check FAQs

Most Asked Video Tutorials :

For more tutorials, Check Video Tutorials

Submit Feedback/Suggestion :

Email :
Please provide your email address so we can follow up on your feedback.
Category :
Description :
Min 15 characters0/2000
TMI Blog
Home / TMI Blogs / RSS

1997 (12) TMI 358

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....iling duty (additional duty of Customs) paid on certain component parts imported by them which had been used in the manufacture of coloured T.V. sets exported by them. They had originally claimed drawback of duty on such exports but what was sanctioned to them as drawback was only on account of the Customs duty paid on the imported goods and the Central Excise duty paid on the indigenously procured items. Their contention before the authorities below was that the element of countervailing duty paid on the imported goods had not been included in the drawback rates. They had taken up the matter with the Ministry of Finance and got a reply from them that in fixing the drawback rates the element of countervailing duty paid on the imported compo....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....declaration under Rule 57G which is a basic requirement under the Modvat Scheme. He supported the impugned order. 3. I have taken note of the submissions of both the sides. I have perused the record. The facts of the case as have come out in the order of the authorities below and which were referred to during the hearing of the present appeal indicate that the appellant has turned to relief available under Rule 57F(4) as currently in force after having lost the case for benefit of drawback on exported goods manufactured with imported components. It is the contention that the drawback amount fixed by the Ministry of Finance had not taken into account the countervailing duty portion relating to the imported components. Since they were....