1998 (1) TMI 184

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....r the Respondents. [Order per : G.R. Sharma, Member (T)]. - We have heard both sides on condonation of delay. The applicant has submitted that delay occurred on account of the fact that the Collectorate's work was being divided into a few more Collectorates on their creation. It was argued because of this re-distribution of the work, there was dislocation of the staff and re-distribution of the....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

.... Advocate submits that the respondents had claimed the benefit not only of Notification No. 1/93-C.E. but were covered by Notification No. 14/92-C.E. which they had claimed. She submits that even if on reference, the Hon'ble Delhi High Court decided the case in favour of the department, they will still be entitled to the benefit. We have perused the submissions of both sides. We find that the issu....