1997 (12) TMI 295
X X X X Extracts X X X X
X X X X Extracts X X X X
.... the Respondent. [Order per : J.H. Joglekar, Member (T)]. - The appellants in this case requested for a decision on merit which we proceed to do after hearing Shri R.S. Sangia, learned JDR. 2. Notification No. 280/77, dated 12-8-1977 exempted woollen and acrylic spun yarn containing non-cellulosic fibre in the form of wastes or in the form of fibre produced out of such wastes, ....
X X X X Extracts X X X X
X X X X Extracts X X X X
....vidence to substantiate their claim for notification and confirmed the demand. The Collector (Appeals) having upheld his findings on the same logic, the present appeal is before us. 3. We have carefully perused the subject notification. 4. It is well settled that the claimant has to substantiate his claim to the benefit of the notification. This was so held by the Supreme Court in ....
TaxTMI