Just a moment...

Top
Help
×

By creating an account you can:

Logo TaxTMI
>
Call Us / Help / Feedback

Contact Us At :

E-mail: [email protected]

Call / WhatsApp at: +91 99117 96707

For more information, Check Contact Us

FAQs :

To know Frequently Asked Questions, Check FAQs

Most Asked Video Tutorials :

For more tutorials, Check Video Tutorials

Submit Feedback/Suggestion :

Email :
Please provide your email address so we can follow up on your feedback.
Category :
Description :
Min 15 characters0/2000
TMI Blog
Home / TMI Blogs / RSS

1998 (1) TMI 132

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....nt. [Order per : Justice U.L. Bhat, President]. -  Appellant is absent in spite of notice of hearing. There is no representation and no request for adjournment. We have heard Shri M. Ali, JDR and perused the papers. 2. This appeal is directed against the Order No. 40/91, dated 18-9-1991 passed by the Additional Collector of Central Excise, Bombay confirming demand of Rs. 1,11,46....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....isted the notice, the Additional Collector confirmed the demand. Hence the present appeal. 4. We find that Order No. 8/82 relied on in the show cause notice was set aside by the Tribunal by Order No. 1469/90-A in Appeal No. ED/SB/81-83-A. The Tribunal relying on the another judgment of the Tribunal set aside the order and remanded the case to the Collector for fresh disposal. Thereupon Col....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....and in this view the demand would not lie. 5. The present dispute relates to a subsequent period. The facts referred to by the Collector in the aforesaid order are similar to the facts in the present case. There is no reason why the findings recorded by the Collector in the order dated 29-10-1991 should not be applied to the subsequent period covered by the present dispute. There is no dis....