Just a moment...

Top
Help
×

By creating an account you can:

Logo TaxTMI
Call Us / Help / Feedback

Contact Us At :

E-mail: [email protected]

Call / WhatsApp at: +91 99117 96707

For more information, Check Contact Us

FAQs :

To know Frequently Asked Questions, Check FAQs

Most Asked Video Tutorials :

For more tutorials, Check Video Tutorials

Submit Feedback/Suggestion :

Email :
Please provide your email address so we can follow up on your feedback.
Category :
Description :
Min 15 characters0/2000
TMI Blog
Home / TMI Blogs / RSS

1997 (12) TMI 241

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....ne, for the Respondent. [Order per : G.A. Brahma Deva, Member (J)]. -  Heard Shri R.S. Sangia, ld. DR for the Revenue. The respondents remained absent in spite of notice. In the Order-in-Appeal the Collector (Appeals), following the earlier Order No. 334/88-B, dated 30-11-1988 and for the reasons stated in the same order, has accepted the contention of the assessee and accordingly the o....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....ently taking the view that refund claim is admissible although price list under which duty was paid not modified or revised. It is settled position now that the excise authorities are not stopped from taking a view different than in approved classification list and similarly assessee also can ask for re-assessment while filing a refund claim under Section 11B of the Act. In the instant case, it is....