1997 (12) TMI 171
X X X X Extracts X X X X
X X X X Extracts X X X X
...., for the Respondent. [Order per G.R. Sharma, Member (T)]. - Arguing the captioned ROM Application, Ms. Tamali Wad, the ld. Advocate for the applicant, submitted that a mistake apparent on the face of the record has crept in the Final Order of the Tribunal No. 501/97-NB, dated 30-6-1997. She submits that the Tribunal has erred in finding that the packet tea was not manufactured by the applic....
X X X X Extracts X X X X
X X X X Extracts X X X X
.... was based on the grounds of appeal and statement of facts as stated by the Collector of Central Excise who was the appellant in the case. 3. On careful consideration of the submissions made by both sides, we note that there is no mistake on the face of the record inasmuch as in the statement of facts submitted by the appellants, it has clearly been stated that Notification No. 217/86 exem....
TaxTMI