Loading...

⚠ โœ•
❮ Top
☎ Help
Draft upto 3 replies to a
tax notice โ€” FREE ๐ŸŽ‰ โœ•

150 credits ยท 30 days

โ€ข Basic Search โ†’ 1 Credit
โ€ข Advanced Search โ†’ 3 Credits
โ€ข Drafter โ†’ 20 to extract + 25 per issue
(โ‰ˆ upto 2-3 drafts on us)

Already used our earlier 20-Credit Demo?
You are still eligible for this new 150-Credit Demo.

Activate your FREE Demo โ†’
☰
×

By creating an account you can:

Logo TaxTMI
Call Us / Help / Feedbackโœ•

Contact Us At :

✉ E-mail: [email protected]

✆ Call / WhatsApp at: +91 99117 96707

For more information, Check Contact Us

FAQs :

To know Frequently Asked Questions, Check FAQs

Most Asked Video Tutorials :

For more tutorials, Check Video Tutorials

Submit Feedback/Suggestion :

Email :
Please provide your email address so we can follow up on your feedback.
Category :
Description :
Min 15 characters 0/2000
TMI Blog
Home / TMI Blogs / RSS

1997 (6) TMI 204

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....ENTED BY : Shri K.K. Anand, Advocate, for the Appellant. Shri M. Jayaraman, JDR, for the Respondent. [Order per : S.L. Peeran, Member (J)]. - All these appeals arise from common order passed by Collector (Appeals), New Delhi. The issue pertaining to these appeals as well as revenue appeals is the correct classification of Hot rolled flat products of Iron and Steel having thickness below 5....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....ned above, it is the contention of the appellants that those should be classified as "rectangular bars" and classified under sub-heading 7209.90 and the third category of products which are of thickness of and above 3 mm but below 5 mm and claimed classification under the same sub-heading 7209.90, attracting duty at the rate of Rs. 365/- per M.T. in all the above three cases. The Collector had dis....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....ready been applied in respect of five appeals and the impugned order in respect of those appeals has already been set aside. He submits that the ratio of the order of the Tribunal in the case of Calcutta Steel Industries and that of the order passed in respect of the assessee's appeals against the impugned order by Final Order Nos. E/939-943/97-B should also be applied. 3. Ld. DR reiterate....