Just a moment...

Top
Help
×

By creating an account you can:

Logo TaxTMI
>
Call Us / Help / Feedback

Contact Us At :

E-mail: [email protected]

Call / WhatsApp at: +91 99117 96707

For more information, Check Contact Us

FAQs :

To know Frequently Asked Questions, Check FAQs

Most Asked Video Tutorials :

For more tutorials, Check Video Tutorials

Submit Feedback/Suggestion :

Email :
Please provide your email address so we can follow up on your feedback.
Category :
Description :
Min 15 characters0/2000
TMI Blog
Home / RSS

1997 (5) TMI 235

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....ellant. Shri R.K. Talajia, JDR, for the Respondent. [Order per : Gowri Shankar, Member (T)]. - A sum of Rs. 45,44,658/- has been demanded as duty and an equal sum imposed as penalty under Rule 57-I(4) of Central Excise Rules, 1944. Representative of the applicant says that the amount has been demanded on two grounds. First is that the appellant issued documents showing clearance of inputs....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....e was no revenue loss since the duty paid on clearance of the finished goods in each case. As regards second ground it is contended that goods were received from M/s. Kaira Cans Co. that for printing again on job work basis and imported either by it or by others. He contends that in various decision of Tribunal Modvat credit is allowable. He cited the decision in Kay Polyplast Ltd. v. Collector of....