1997 (4) TMI 201

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

.... the Respondent. [Order per : Shiben K. Dhar, Member (T)]. -  This appeal is directed against order-in-original dated 23-4-1991 of Addl. Collector of Customs. The appellants imported Scanner along with Camag Linomat IV. While they were given benefit under OGL in respect of scanner, it was held that Camag Linomat IV is not an essential part of scanner but is only a separate accessory or ....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....s 2, 3, 5, 6 List 8 and Appendix 8. It was contended by the ld. Advocate that these accessories are not listed in Appendix 2, 3, 5, 6 of Appendix 8 and there was no challenge to it. 5. In view of this we are satisfied that the impugned goods could be permitted under OGL. In regard to classification, ld. Advocate submitted that they claimed classification under Heading 90.27 but Addl. Colle....