Just a moment...

Top
Help
×

By creating an account you can:

Logo TaxTMI
Call Us / Help / Feedback

Contact Us At :

E-mail: [email protected]

Call / WhatsApp at: +91 99117 96707

For more information, Check Contact Us

FAQs :

To know Frequently Asked Questions, Check FAQs

Most Asked Video Tutorials :

For more tutorials, Check Video Tutorials

Submit Feedback/Suggestion :

Email :
Please provide your email address so we can follow up on your feedback.
Category :
Description :
Min 15 characters0/2000
TMI Blog
Home / TMI Blogs / RSS

1997 (6) TMI 122

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....or the Appellant. Shri Satnam Singh, SDR, for the Respondent. [Order per : G.R. Sharma, Member (T)]. -  In the captioned application, the applicant has submitted that there has been an error apparent on the face of the records inasmuch as the point of limitation was taken up not only in the memo of appeal but also at the time of personal hearing. But the same was not considered while....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....submissions of the learned Counsel. From the records we find that the two appeals were listed together. We also note that the arguments advanced by the appellants in the case of M/s. Kumar Enterprises were adopted for arguing the case of M/s. Swastik Industrial Power Lines P.Ltd. Since the two appeals were heard together perhaps there was some mix up. The order of M/s. Kumar Enterprises i.e. the T....