Just a moment...

Top
Help
×

By creating an account you can:

Logo TaxTMI
>
Call Us / Help / Feedback

Contact Us At :

E-mail: [email protected]

Call / WhatsApp at: +91 99117 96707

For more information, Check Contact Us

FAQs :

To know Frequently Asked Questions, Check FAQs

Most Asked Video Tutorials :

For more tutorials, Check Video Tutorials

Submit Feedback/Suggestion :

Email :
Please provide your email address so we can follow up on your feedback.
Category :
Description :
Min 15 characters0/2000
TMI Blog
Home / TMI Blogs / RSS

1997 (1) TMI 284

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

.... Respondent. [Order per : Justice U.L. Bhat, President]. - Appellant is absent in spite of notice of hearing, but has sent a request for disposal of the appeal on merits. We have heard Shri T. R. Malik, SDR and perused the papers. 2. This appeal is directed against the order passed by the Collector (Appeals) in confirmation of the order passed by the Assistant Collector. 3. A....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

.... value has to be reckoned without deducting the exempted duty element and if so reckoned, the clearances during the period had crossed the exemption limit and duty on the excess would be payable. 4. Appellant submitted a long reply raising various contentions, including the contention that appellant was availing partial exemption of duty under Notification No. 245/83 also. It was pointed o....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....rect. So far as the first clearances of the value of Rs. 7.5 lakhs are concerned, since there was full exemption available, the duty element cannot be deducted from Rs. 7.5 lakhs to arrive at a lesser assessable value. 7. According to the appellant, the difficulty arose on account of availing of the partial exemption granted in Notification No. 245/83. According to the appellant, the notif....