Just a moment...

βœ•
Top
Help
πŸš€ New: Section-Wise Filter βœ•

1. Search Case laws by Section / Act / Rule β€” now available beyond Income Tax. GST and Other Laws Available

2. New: β€œIn Favour Of” filter added in Case Laws.

Try both these filters in Case Laws β†’

×

By creating an account you can:

Logo TaxTMI
>
Call Us / Help / Feedbackβœ•

Contact Us At :

E-mail: [email protected]

Call / WhatsApp at: +91 99117 96707

For more information, Check Contact Us

FAQs :

To know Frequently Asked Questions, Check FAQs

Most Asked Video Tutorials :

For more tutorials, Check Video Tutorials

Submit Feedback/Suggestion :

Email :
Please provide your email address so we can follow up on your feedback.
Category :
Description :
Min 15 characters0/2000
TMI Blog
Home / RSS

1997 (2) TMI 241

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

.... J.H. Joglekar, Member (T)]. - The appellants are small scale manufacturers of steel flats. They removed such dutiable flats without cover of gate pass. Officers, on visit to the factory, found that three gate passes were made out without indicating the weight and value of the goods as well as names of the consignees. They also found that PLA did not have sufficient balance to cover the duty lev....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....to the gate pass. As regards non-recording of the names of the consignees, it was claimed that it was for the Thekedar of the carts to decide as to which consignment would be delivered first. It has been claimed that order of the Superintendent quantifying the quantum of fine as percentage of the value is not a legal order. It is also claimed that quantum of penalty is harsh. Further claim is made....