1996 (10) TMI 169

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....arwal, for the Respondents. [Order]. - The learned Counsel stated that their application filed in the Registry on 24-9-1996 is not a Misc. application but a stay application filed by M/s. Kashmir Vanaspati Ltd. with reference to the order of the Collector of Central Excise (Appeals), Chandigarh, dated 13-12-1993. 2. Actually this matter had come up earlier in 1994 when their stay app....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....same matter, two proceedings developed. At the Collector (Appeals) stage the matter was remanded on time bar and they had come up in appeal on merits to the Tribunal, a situation arose in which the matter in respect of their appeal regarding merits of the case was pending in the Tribunal while the remand proceedings on the aspect of time bar continued at Assistant Collector level and after his dec....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

.... should have made appropriate request in this regard so that an order covering all the aspects was passed. At this stage, since the Tribunal has already disposed of the stay application and passed a conditional stay order dated 24-5-1996, it would not be appropriate to pass another order. 6. From whatever the learned Counsel has stated, it appears to be a case of split proceedings but atle....