Just a moment...

Top
Help
×

By creating an account you can:

Logo TaxTMI
Call Us / Help / Feedback

Contact Us At :

E-mail: [email protected]

Call / WhatsApp at: +91 99117 96707

For more information, Check Contact Us

FAQs :

To know Frequently Asked Questions, Check FAQs

Most Asked Video Tutorials :

For more tutorials, Check Video Tutorials

Submit Feedback/Suggestion :

Email :
Please provide your email address so we can follow up on your feedback.
Category :
Description :
Min 15 characters0/2000
TMI Blog
Home / TMI Blogs / RSS

1996 (9) TMI 303

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....P. Devnath, Advocate, for the Respondents. [Order]. -  This is a reference application filed by the department w.r.t. the order of the Tribunal No. A/363/96-NB, dated 29-1-1996 passed by Hon'ble Member (T) Sh. K. Sankararaman. 2. At the outset a question arose regarding the jurisdiction to hear this matter by the present Bench and the attention of the Bench was drawn towards the....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....n (2) of section 81A of the Gold (Control) Act, shall be heard by a Bench consisting of the Members who heard the appeal giving rise to the application, unless the President directs otherwise]." 5. The Reference Applications are considered by the Tribunal under Rule 31 of the same Rules and reads as follows :- "Same Bench to hear the reference applications. - The same Bench which heard ....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....a Member/Members who did not originally hear the appeal and passed the orders. To this extent the President can direct `otherwise'. 7. In other words when a Member/(s) is/(are) available the application is ordinarily required to be heard by the same Member(s) who passed the final order. 8. I, therefore, hold that the ratio of the Supreme Court judgment in the case of Elpro Intt. Lt....