Just a moment...

Top
Help
×

By creating an account you can:

Logo TaxTMI
>
Call Us / Help / Feedback

Contact Us At :

E-mail: [email protected]

Call / WhatsApp at: +91 99117 96707

For more information, Check Contact Us

FAQs :

To know Frequently Asked Questions, Check FAQs

Most Asked Video Tutorials :

For more tutorials, Check Video Tutorials

Submit Feedback/Suggestion :

Email :
Please provide your email address so we can follow up on your feedback.
Category :
Description :
Min 15 characters0/2000
TMI Blog
Home / TMI Blogs / RSS

1996 (8) TMI 203

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....Entry dated 3-10-1994 for clearance of 100 pcs of "King Sovereign" (Gold Coins) of 22 carat purity each weighing 8 gms and collectively 800 gms having assessable value of Rs. 3,34,280/-. They classified the goods under Customs Tariff Heading 7118.90 and sought clearance thereof against the Special Import Licence (SIL) issued in terms of ITC Public Notice No. 64 (PN) 1992-97 dated 21-10-1992 and Public Notice No. 120 (PN) 1992-97 dated 31-3-1993 claiming the benefit of Notification No. 117/94-Cus. and declared on the Bill of Entry that duty shall be paid in convertible foreign currency out of the "Exchange Earnings, Foreign Currency Account". Customs authorities found that EXIM Policy 1992-97 allows the import of gold under Special Import Li....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

.... the annexure to the said public notice listed items which were allowed under SIL and Sl. No. 1 thereof covered "gold". They further contended that on receipt of notice from Assistant Collector they had clarified that the impugned coins were neither antiques nor were they currency in circulation and that the Reserve Bank of India had clarified to the Ministry of Finance that import of gold coins against SIL was valid. They also brought to the notice of the adjudicating authority that gold coins were being imported by MMTC under the SIL on payment of duty. Collector (Appeals) by his order dated 31-8-1995 reversed the order-in-original and held that gold coins were permissible to import under the cover of SIL and were eligible to avail of the....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

.... distinction between the separate sub-headings of Chapter 72 though the said notification was issued only on 27-4-1994. The fact that the exemption was granted by the said notification to gold and silver falling within Chapter 71 without indicating any distinction between different sub-headings, indicated that the word 'gold' in the SIL was perceived in the broader context as 'gold' in any form falling within Chapter 71 of the Customs Tariff. If the intention was to restrict the exemption to any special form of gold or any manufactured or semi-manufactured condition the exemption notification would have restricted grant of such exemption to the specific sub-headings pertaining to gold in unwrought or semi-manufactured form. 2. In th....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....for. 3. Appearing for the Revenue the learned DR reiterated the grounds of appeal and prayed for setting aside of the impugned order and retention of the order-in-original. 4. Opposing the prayer of the Department, the learned Counsel relied on the decision of the Tribunal in Appeal No. C/496/95-D CCE v. R.G. Shahi & M/s Chauhan Zaveer in which the Tribunal held that gold included all forms of gold. The Tribunal has not given any finding that gold did not include gold jewellery. He also relied on the Bombay High Court judgment in Commercial Sales Tax Officer v. Agarwal & Co. reported in 1883 (12) E.L.T. 116 in support of his contention that a general item would cover all varieties of goods under an item. He also relied on th....