1996 (7) TMI 296
X X X X Extracts X X X X
X X X X Extracts X X X X
....e Respondents. [Order per : G.R. Sharma, Member (T)]. - By the present ROM application, the applicants have contended that there have been two errors in the Final Order No. 27/95-C, dated 10-1-1995. Shri R.S. Dinkar, the learned Advocate appearing for the applicants submits that the Tribunal raised one point about leviable of Additional Duty of Customs by classifying old and used tyres under....
X X X X Extracts X X X X
X X X X Extracts X X X X
....2 has not been correctly applied to the facts of the present case. Thus there was a mistake apparent and should be rectified. 2. Shri J.M. Sharma, the learned DR opposing the application for rectification of mistake submitted that there is no mistake apparent on the face of the record and therefore, the ROM application may be rejected. 3. Heard the submissions of both sides. We fin....
TaxTMI