1996 (3) TMI 261

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....ndi, DR, for the Respondent. [Order per : V.P. Gulati, Member (T)]. - This appeal is against the order of the CCE, Madras. Duty has been demanded from the appellants for the reason that they did not qualify for the benefit [of] the provisions of Rule 56C under which they were entitled to the benefit of clearance of the goods duty free being secondary manufacturer in terms of Rule 56C of the ....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....ld to be guilty of procedural lapses and that since raw material was received by the appellants and the same was returned to the principal manufacturer after the completion of the job work duty should not have been demanded from the appellants. 3. The learned DR does not contest the above position. The learned lower appellate authority has not entered any finding that the raw material had ....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....llan as envisaged under Rule 56C. It is seen that the appellants were maintaining their records for return of the goods manufactured out of the raw material supplied by the principal manufacturer. There is no finding entered that these goods could not be related to the principal manufacturer. The only finding entered is that bolts and nuts which were used in the manufacture of item 68 goods. We ob....