Just a moment...

Report
FeedbackReport
Bars
×

By creating an account you can:

Logo TaxTMI
>
Feedback/Report an Error
Email :
Please provide your email address so we can follow up on your feedback.
Category :
Description :
Min 15 characters0/2000
TMI Blog
Home / RSS

1996 (5) TMI 131

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

.... : P. K. Desai, Member (J)]. -  For hearing the appellants Appeal on merits, they are required to deposit a sum of Rs. 6,88,176.86, and the penalty amount of Rs. 15,000/. The appellants submit that they have already deposited the penalty amount and the stay sought for is only in relation to the duty demanded. 2. Mr. M.H. Patil, the Ld. Advocate appearing for the appellants submits that....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....n which the demand has been confirmed is that the appellants ought to have reversed the modvat credit and instead they have utilized the same Modvat credit for the purpose [of] paying the duty on the goods returned by them to their another concerned. In his submission the amount has virtually been reversed and there is no cause for raising the demand. 3. Shri Gurdeep Singh, the Ld. JDR, howe....