1995 (3) TMI 277
X X X X Extracts X X X X
X X X X Extracts X X X X
....s. [Order per : S.K. Bhatnagar, Vice President]. - This is a stay application filed with reference to order of the Collector of Central Excise dated 1-9-1993 and styled as Addendum dated 24-1-1995. 2. The learned Counsel stated that the learned Collector has passed the final order-in-original No. 19/93, dated 24-1-1995 but after 16 months, they were surprised to receive this Addendum by wh....
X X X X Extracts X X X X
X X X X Extracts X X X X
....and pass such an order and that too even without issuing a notice. 5. In a similar matter, the Tribunal had also held that such an order could not be passed as the officer becomes functus officio of issue in an order reported in [1990 (46) E.L.T. 427]. 6. He would therefore, pray for stay of operation of this order and further requested that since this is the only point involved, the a....
X X X X Extracts X X X X
X X X X Extracts X X X X
....rder. Further, there is nothing in the operative part of the Collector's order which would go to show that this demand has been raised in pursuance or as a consequence to the Collector's order or flows therefrom. 11. We have considered the submissions. We feel that prima facie the learned Counsel's contentions have a strong force. The impugned order describes itself as an addendum to the original....


TaxTMI
TaxTMI