Loading...

⚠ โœ•
❮ Top
☎ Help
Draft upto 3 replies to a
tax notice โ€” FREE ๐ŸŽ‰ โœ•

150 credits ยท 30 days

โ€ข Basic Search โ†’ 1 Credit
โ€ข Advanced Search โ†’ 3 Credits
โ€ข Drafter โ†’ 20 to extract + 25 per issue
(โ‰ˆ upto 2-3 drafts on us)

Already used our earlier 20-Credit Demo?
You are still eligible for this new 150-Credit Demo.

Activate your FREE Demo โ†’
☰
×

By creating an account you can:

Logo TaxTMI
Call Us / Help / Feedbackโœ•

Contact Us At :

✉ E-mail: [email protected]

✆ Call / WhatsApp at: +91 99117 96707

For more information, Check Contact Us

FAQs :

To know Frequently Asked Questions, Check FAQs

Most Asked Video Tutorials :

For more tutorials, Check Video Tutorials

Submit Feedback/Suggestion :

Email :
Please provide your email address so we can follow up on your feedback.
Category :
Description :
Min 15 characters 0/2000
TMI Blog
Home / TMI Blogs / RSS

1996 (2) TMI 262

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....he Respondents. [Order per : Shiben K. Dhar, Member (T)]. -  This appeal is directed against Order No. 67/89, dated 18-9-1989. Demands of Rs. 4,27,602.74 and Rs. 1,15,360.40 relating to the period June 1971 to March 1973 and April 1973 to February 1974 respectively have been confirmed by the Additional Collector on the ground that the product declared as alkyd resin falling under Tariff....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

.... by two show cause notices, one dated 5-3-1975 for the period from June 1971 to March 1973 for Rs. 4,27,602.72 and the other dated 6-3-1975 for the period from April 1973 to February 1974 for a sum of Rs. 1,15,360.40. Both the show cause notices have been issued under Rule 10A. Earlier a show cause notice was issued on 18-6-1973 for the period from June 1971 to March 1973 for a sum of Rs. 4,27,602....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....d upon the decision of the Tribunal in the case of N.K. Wollen & Silk Mills v. Collector of Central Excise, 1989 (43) E.L.T. 686 wherein the Tribunal held that the adjudicating authority was obliged to carry out the directions of the appellate authority and he should have either tested the remnant samples or in the event of there being no remnant samples available he should have extended the benef....