Just a moment...

Top
Help
×

By creating an account you can:

Logo TaxTMI
>
Call Us / Help / Feedback

Contact Us At :

E-mail: [email protected]

Call / WhatsApp at: +91 99117 96707

For more information, Check Contact Us

FAQs :

To know Frequently Asked Questions, Check FAQs

Most Asked Video Tutorials :

For more tutorials, Check Video Tutorials

Submit Feedback/Suggestion :

Email :
Please provide your email address so we can follow up on your feedback.
Category :
Description :
Min 15 characters0/2000
TMI Blog
Home / TMI Blogs / RSS

1995 (12) TMI 150

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....eeta Pandey, Advocate, for the Respondent. [Order per : Gowri Shankar, Member (T)]. -  The respondent manufactured urea formaldehyde for captive consumption in the manufacture of plywood. Since the product was liable to duty, the Assistant Collector arrived at its value in terms of Rule 6(b) of the Central Excise (Valuation) Rules. In calculating the cost of production as provided in th....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....e, and not on any rationale commercial considerations. The judgment of the Punjab & Haryana High Court relied upon by Shri Jain in Food Specialities Ltd. v. Appellate Collector of Central Excise & Customs - 1988 (33) E.L.T. 331 did not in fact lay down that an addition of 10% was mandatory, it only confirmed the action of the authorities in adding this figure in the face of a refusal by the assess....