Loading...

⚠ โœ•
❮ Top
☎ Help
Draft upto 3 replies to a
tax notice โ€” FREE ๐ŸŽ‰ โœ•

150 credits ยท 30 days

โ€ข Basic Search โ†’ 1 Credit
โ€ข Advanced Search โ†’ 3 Credits
โ€ข Drafter โ†’ 20 to extract + 25 per issue
(โ‰ˆ upto 2-3 drafts on us)

Already used our earlier 20-Credit Demo?
You are still eligible for this new 150-Credit Demo.

Activate your FREE Demo โ†’
☰
×

By creating an account you can:

Logo TaxTMI
Call Us / Help / Feedbackโœ•

Contact Us At :

✉ E-mail: [email protected]

✆ Call / WhatsApp at: +91 99117 96707

For more information, Check Contact Us

FAQs :

To know Frequently Asked Questions, Check FAQs

Most Asked Video Tutorials :

For more tutorials, Check Video Tutorials

Submit Feedback/Suggestion :

Email :
Please provide your email address so we can follow up on your feedback.
Category :
Description :
Min 15 characters 0/2000
TMI Blog
Home / TMI Blogs / RSS

1995 (7) TMI 203

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

.... for the Respondents. [Order per : G.P. Agarwal, Member (J)]. -  Being aggrieved with the impugned Order-in-Appeal passed by the Collector of Central Excise (Appeals), whereby he dropped the demand holding that it was time barred, the Revenue has filed the present appeal. 2. When the case was called, Shri Mohan Lal, learned JDR, appeared on behalf of the Revenue and Shri S.C. Vi....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

.... the benefit of Notification No. 329/77 in respect of glass rods manufactured by them. This was in pursuance of a show cause notice dated 27-8-1981 and the period of demand was January, 1978 to March, 1979. The issue relates to process of manufacture in the light of the provisions of the said notification. It will not be wrong to presume that the appellants could not have suppressed the process of....