1995 (7) TMI 192

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....R, for the Respondent. [Order]. -  This is an appeal against the order of the Collector of Central Excise (Appeals), Chandigarh confirming the demand for duty. 2. I have heard Shri Gopal Prasad, advocate for the appellant and Shri Sanjeev Sachdeva Departmental Representative for the department. 3. The appellant was a manufacturer of forged products. For this purpose it r....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....aken from the Assistant Collector. Shri Gopal Prasad points out that the appellant had been granted permission under Rule 57F(2) in January 1988. There was therefore at most a procedural interaction which should not come in the way of the appellant availing modvat credit. He relies upon the decision of the South Regional Bench of this Tribunal in Maschmeijer Aromatics (I) Ltd. v. Collector of Cent....