Just a moment...

⚠✕
❮ Top
☎ Help
☰
×

By creating an account you can:

Logo TaxTMI
>
Keyword Search :
AI Tools : New
Ask tax questions in natural language. Powered by AI trained on the TaxTMI legal database. Use AI Tools ➞
Call Us / Help / Feedback✕

Contact Us At :

✉ E-mail: [email protected]

✆ Call / WhatsApp at: +91 99117 96707

For more information, Check Contact Us

FAQs :

To know Frequently Asked Questions, Check FAQs

Most Asked Video Tutorials :

For more tutorials, Check Video Tutorials

Submit Feedback/Suggestion :

Email :
Please provide your email address so we can follow up on your feedback.
Category :
Description :
Min 15 characters0/2000
TMI Blog
Home / RSS
PrevPreviousNextNext

1994 (10) TMI 159

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

.... the Appellants. Shri B.D. Bhagat, JDR, for the Respondent. [Order per : K. Sankararaman, Member (T)]. - Shri H.P. Arora, learned Counsel, for the applicants states that in this case penalty has been imposed on them under Rule 173Q which he contends is not applicable in the facts of the case. If at all, any penalty is attracted, it may be under Rule 223 which has a ceiling of Rs. 1,000/-.....

PrevPreviousNextNext