1983 (11) TMI 213

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....for the Respondents. [Order per : A.J.F. D' Souza, Member (T)]. - This is a Revision Application against Order-in-Appeal No. S/49-1330/77-GS dated 27-6-1978 passed by the Appellate Collector of Customs, Bombay, which has been transferred by the Government of India to the Tribunal for disposal under Section 131B(2) of the Customs Act, 1962. 2. A consignment of Ejection Seats, Parachutes an....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

...., therefore, rejected the appeal as un-substantiated. 3. In the present appeal it is stated that the contract No. quoted in the DEC by the Ministry of Defence is No. HAL-LD/4530/6-C-PUR/72/0044 whereas the invoices indicate P.O. No. HAL-LD/4530/6-C-PUR/71/P.O./ 0044/6022 and the reasons for variation are as under :- (i) 6022 shown in the invoice is the despatch number of the appellants under....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....JT-16 aircrafts only. All the goods are stated to be covered by Release Notes numbers EO 396, EO 397, EO 415 & D 4262 which is the sole authority for use of these goods in Aircraft. In view of this evidence a request has been made to grant the refund of Rs. 1,24,219.18. 4. Wg. Cdr. Tandon explained the discrepancy between the numbering of the Purchase Order and the DEC and wanted appeal to b....