1992 (8) TMI 202

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....the Appellant. Shri J.F. Pochkanawalla, Sr. Advocate, for the Respondent. [Order per : G.P. Agarwal, Member (J)]. - The basic issue involved in all these captioned five appeals is whether re-rubberisation of old and worn out rubberised M.S. Rims amounts to a process of manufacture within the meaning of Section 2(f) of the Central Excises and Salt Act, 1944. 2. Appearing on behalf of th....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....8-C Collector of Central Excise, Bombay-I v. Hindustan Tyres (P) Ltd., Bombay. In this backdrop, he submitted that the present appeals be rejected. 3. We have considered the submissions. The issue involved in all these appeals, as aforesaid, is whether re-rubberisation of old and used rubberised M.S. Rims amounts to manufacture within the meaning of Section 2(f) of the Act. The Tribunal in its ....