Just a moment...

Top
Help
×

By creating an account you can:

Logo TaxTMI
>
Call Us / Help / Feedback

Contact Us At :

E-mail: [email protected]

Call / WhatsApp at: +91 99117 96707

For more information, Check Contact Us

FAQs :

To know Frequently Asked Questions, Check FAQs

Most Asked Video Tutorials :

For more tutorials, Check Video Tutorials

Submit Feedback/Suggestion :

Email :
Please provide your email address so we can follow up on your feedback.
Category :
Description :
Min 15 characters0/2000
TMI Blog
Home / TMI Blogs / RSS

1992 (3) TMI 216

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

...., Nasik, L4 No. 1 NES/80 hereinafter called the respondents filed classification list effective from 1-4-1983 claiming steel gate hooks & Eyes of different varieties, M hooks, B Eyes and various hooks at Sr. No. 1 to 29 of the above classification list as falling under T.I. 68. 3. Assistant Collector, Central Excise, Nasik observed that the same items under dispute are not classifiable under T.I. 68 and they are correctly classifiable under T.I. 52 on the ground that these items are covered by the explanatory note to the Tariff entry. Explanation to Tariff Item No. 52 makes it; abundantly clear that it does not only include nuts, bolts and screws but includes all hardware items which are described therein and that tariff does not provide....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....h M. Hooks and B. Eyes under Item 52 CET stands settled by various Supreme Court, High Court and Tribunal decisions. The Supreme Court decisions in the case of Plasmac Machine Manufacturing v. CCE - reported in 1991 (51) E.L.T. 161 (SC) = 1991 (32) ECR 1 (SC), Jaishree Engineering Co. Pvt. Ltd. v. CCE - reported in 1989 (40) E.L.T. 214 (SC) = 1989 (21) ECR 177 (SC), the Tribunal decisions in the case of CCE v. Elecon Engineering - reported in 1992 (38) ECR 340 (CEGAT Special Bench-D) and Order No. E/341/91-D, dated 31-7-1991 in the case of CCE v. MM Industries were ; cited and it was urged that the goods considered in the last named CEGAT decision were identical. Therefore, classification of the goods was correctly done under Item 52 CET an....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....ied on with the aid of power. Explanation - The expression 'Bolts and nuts, threaded or tapped and screws' used in this item shall include bolt ends, screw studs, screw studding, self-tapped screws, screw hooks and screw rings." The goods in the present case are described as M hooks, B Eyes and various hooks as per their classification list. The Asstt. Collector in his Order dated 22-11-1983 in para three thereof has described the function of the products as explained by the respondents, which is as follows : "Shri A.R. Mehta, power of attorney holder appeared for hearing. He gave the detailed submissions alongwith samples with demonstration making it clear that there is no fastening involved in any of these items and requested to ....