Just a moment...

Top
Help
×

By creating an account you can:

Logo TaxTMI
Call Us / Help / Feedback

Contact Us At :

E-mail: [email protected]

Call / WhatsApp at: +91 99117 96707

For more information, Check Contact Us

FAQs :

To know Frequently Asked Questions, Check FAQs

Most Asked Video Tutorials :

For more tutorials, Check Video Tutorials

Submit Feedback/Suggestion :

Email :
Please provide your email address so we can follow up on your feedback.
Category :
Description :
Min 15 characters0/2000
TMI Blog
Home / TMI Blogs / RSS

1992 (8) TMI 175

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

.... a penalty of Rs. 50/000/- on the appellant under Section 113(d) of the Customs Act, 1962. 2. This case pertains to the seizure of certain goods allegedly meant for illegal export to Nepal. These goods were stored in the premises of the appellant situated at Raxaul. 355 bundles of creamware paper worth Rs. 1,23,670/-were found in the godown of the appellant and he could not produce any record. The Officers seized the same on a reasonable belief that these are meant for illegal export to Nepal. The Manager of the appellant company, Shri H.R. Choudhury stated that a person of the consignee of Kathmandu requested him at the time of unloading the goods on 9-7-1982 to keep the goods till a permit from Indian Embassy was obtained. That permiss....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....ey have transported the goods at Raxaul and kept them in the appellants' godown so as to illegally export them to Nepal as and when the trade permits for the same. He also contended that M/s. Rohtas Industries was the party who wanted to export the same to Nepal in favour of Pooja Trade Links of Kathmandu and the consignment had moved on for being exported to Nepal. Therefore, he stated that the appellant is a person concerned with respect to the attempt of illegally exporting the goods in question. 5. We have considered the submissions. It is now seen that the appellants have a godown at Raxaul. The goods in question arrived at the godown of the appellants on 9-7-1982. The raid was made on 4-9-1982. Till then the goods remained in the g....