Just a moment...

Top
Help
×

By creating an account you can:

Logo TaxTMI
>
Call Us / Help / Feedback

Contact Us At :

E-mail: [email protected]

Call / WhatsApp at: +91 99117 96707

For more information, Check Contact Us

FAQs :

To know Frequently Asked Questions, Check FAQs

Most Asked Video Tutorials :

For more tutorials, Check Video Tutorials

Submit Feedback/Suggestion :

Email :
Please provide your email address so we can follow up on your feedback.
Category :
Description :
Min 15 characters0/2000
TMI Blog
Home / TMI Blogs / RSS

1991 (8) TMI 212

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

.... of the Customs Act, 1962 and another sum of Rs. 25,000/- under the Gold (Control) Act, 1968, on the present appellant. 2. The facts of the case are that on the basis of information, on 20-3-1986 the Officers of the Central Excise of Allahabad intercepted the appellant and another person; namely, Gopal Das while they were handing over the railway tickets to the Ticket Collector. The case of the Department is that on search 16 gold biscuits of foreign origin valuing at Rs. 4 lakhs were recovered from the appellant as well as the other person. The Department alleged that 8 gold biscuits were recovered from the possession of the appellant which were concealed on his body. Thereafter the confessional statements of the appellant as well as Go....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....that the appellant was given a chance for personal hearing. He also contended that in the body of the order, several facts pertaining to the case of the appellant were narrated by the learned adjudicating authority. He also pointed out that the confessional statement of the appellant is very vivid and it contained a wealth of information. It was also contended that the appellant was examined on four different dates and on all the dates he confessed the guilt. In such circumstances, he contended that the orders may be confirmed. 5. We have considered the submissions. We feel that for appreciation of the appellant's contention, mainly on the point of non-consideration of the reply statement by him, it is necessary to reproduce the operativ....