1990 (3) TMI 198

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....e Respondents. [Order per : K. Sankararainan, Member (T)]. - Shri. N. Mookherjee, learned advocate appearing for the appellants, the Tata Iron & Steel Company Limited, Jamshedpur, submitted that in this case the Assistant Collector of Central Excise, Jamshedpur, while sanctioning a refund claim in respect of Coke Oven Gas, amounting to Rs. 3,34,822.67 paise had deducted a sum of Rs. 3,21,473....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....on of Section 11 of the Central Excises & Salt Act, 1944, as spelt out in the order-in-appeal. He pleaded that the appeal may be dismissed. 3. We have considered the arguments from both sides. We have also gone through the impugned order-in-appeal and also the order of the Tribunal cited by Shri Mookherjee. We find that the latter order is not applicable to the facts of the present case. In tha....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....ove cited case, we find that, as observed by the Collector (Appeals) in his impugned order-in-appeal, the other case of the appellants pertaining to Sulphuric acid the amount in respect of which was adjusted against the refund due to them, was sub judice in the revision stage as pleaded by the appellants before him. He has also observed that so long as the original order had not been set aside by ....