1989 (8) TMI 203

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....the Respondent. [Order].  - This motion is to permit utilisation of frozen assets by investment in petitioner's concerns and their repatriation subject to the result of the petition. 2. Non-resident Indians (NRIs) have been doing their bit by the motherland by investing in this country monies earned elsewhere. To tap this important source for improving the country's economy, the Gove....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

.... January 21, 1983. This led to the institution of the petition. In this petition, petitioner claims a declaration of his being an NRI under Section 2(p)(i) of the Foreign Exchange Regulation Act, quashing of the contrary declaration and an injunction to restrain Respondents from treating his accounts as though he were ordinarily resident in this country. The petition has been admitted and interim ....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....ces are made. 4. Respondents 1 and 2 raise two objections: Firstly, the motion seeks a relief beyond the petition which makes it liable to dismissal in limine. Secondly, it ensures to petitioner the very relief he claims as final at an interim stage and that in contravention of the law. The objections are bereft of merit and negatived for the reasons given below. 5. The terms on which permis....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....rom treating the funds as the monies of a resident. On his part petitioner cannot repatriate the money until the disposal of the petition. Petitioner doesn't gain from this stalemate and the loss that he sustains is not only deprival of income that can accrue from the use of the money. Incessant inflation is eating into the real value of the frozen funds inflicting on petitioner an injury that is ....