2010 (8) TMI 154

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....; Mr. Sanjeev Kaushik, Sr. Standing counsel for the revenue ADARSH KUMAR GOEL, J. 1. This appeal has been preferred by the revenue under Section 35G of the Central Excise Act, 1944 (for short, "the Act") against order dated 21.9.2004 passed by the Customs, Excise & Services Tax Appellate Tribunal, New Delhi proposing to raise following substantial question of law:- "Whether the Show Ca....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....olving suppression of facts or contravention of rules with intention to evade duty. The said view has been upheld by the Tribunal. 3. We have heard learned counsel for the appellant. None appears for the respondent inspite of service. 4. Learned counsel for the appellant submits that in view of judgment of the Hon'ble Supreme Court in Pahwa Chemicals Pvt. Ltd. v. CCE 2005 (181) ELT 339, orde....