2008 (10) TMI 344
X X X X Extracts X X X X
X X X X Extracts X X X X
....r per : Adarsh Kumar Goel, J.]. - The assessee has preferred this appeal under section 130 of the Customs Act, 1962 (in short, 'the Act') against the order dated 4-4-2006 Passed by the Customs Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal, New Delhi [2006 (202) E.L.T. 611 (Tribunal)]. 2. The assessee imported goods against DEPB Scrips without payment of duty. It was later found that DEPB Scrips wer....
X X X X Extracts X X X X
X X X X Extracts X X X X
.... considering the observations of the Hon'ble Supreme Court in East India Commercial Company limited v. Collector - 1983 (13) E.L.T. 1342 (S.C.) = AIR 1962 SC 1893, Collector of Customs, Bombay v. Sneha Sales Corporation - 2000 (121) E.L.T. 577, Sampat Raj Dugar - 1992 (58) E.L.T. 163 and Aban Loyd Chiles Offshore Ltd. and others v. Commissioner of Customs, Maharashtra - 2006 (200) E.L.T. 370 (S.C.....
X X X X Extracts X X X X
X X X X Extracts X X X X
....before the Tribunal. Benefit of a forged document cannot be allowed to be retained. The judgment relied upon does not in any manner lay down that benefit of a forged document could be allowed to be retained. The principle laid down in the judgment relied upon which has been followed in other judgments cannot, thus, apply to the case of the present nature where benefit has been taken on the basis o....
X X X X Extracts X X X X
X X X X Extracts X X X X
....at the documents being forged, the appellant could not be allowed to take advantage of exemption. The Tribunal noticed that the firm with whom the appellant entered into the transaction was not traceable. The appellant itself had come to the conclusion that the documents were forged. In these circumstances, if further opportunity has been given to the appellant on its own asking and for its own be....
TaxTMI