Loading...

⚠ โœ•
❮ Top
☎ Help
Draft upto 3 replies to a
tax notice โ€” FREE ๐ŸŽ‰ โœ•

150 credits ยท 30 days

โ€ข Basic Search โ†’ 1 Credit
โ€ข Advanced Search โ†’ 3 Credits
โ€ข Drafter โ†’ 20 to extract + 25 per issue
(โ‰ˆ upto 2-3 drafts on us)

Already used our earlier 20-Credit Demo?
You are still eligible for this new 150-Credit Demo.

Activate your FREE Demo โ†’
☰
×

By creating an account you can:

Logo TaxTMI
Call Us / Help / Feedbackโœ•

Contact Us At :

✉ E-mail: [email protected]

✆ Call / WhatsApp at: +91 99117 96707

For more information, Check Contact Us

FAQs :

To know Frequently Asked Questions, Check FAQs

Most Asked Video Tutorials :

For more tutorials, Check Video Tutorials

Submit Feedback/Suggestion :

Email :
Please provide your email address so we can follow up on your feedback.
Category :
Description :
Min 15 characters 0/2000
TMI Blog
Home / TMI Blogs / RSS

2010 (2) TMI 500

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

.... the Appellant. Shri J.A. Khan, SDR, for the Respondent. [Order per : S.S. Kang, Vice-President]. - Heard both sides. 2. Appellant filed this Appeal against the impugned order whereby the credit was denied in respect of Continuous Mixture and on Thermostat as capital goods. The contention of the Appellant is that both the items are capital goods and used in the factory of production in or....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

.... Hence credit was rightly denied. For denial of credit in respect of Thermostat the contention is that same is part of refrigeration and air-conditioning machinery therefore specifically excluded from the scope of capital goods. 4. We find that Continuous Mixture is classifiable under Chapter 8474 of the Tariff and as per the provisions of Rule 57Q of the Central Excise Rules all goods falling ....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....these circumstances we find that the matter in respect of eligibility of quantification credit on Thermostat requires re-consideration by the adjudicating authority. The impugned order in this regard is set aside and the matter is remanded to the adjudicating authority to decide afresh after affording an opportunity of hearing to the Appellant. In respect of penalty we find that only penalty of Rs....