2008 (5) TMI 387
X X X X Extracts X X X X
X X X X Extracts X X X X
....ESIDENT AND RAKESH KUMAR, TECHNICAL MEMBER R.S. Sharma for the Appellant. C.S. Rajput for the Respondent. ORDER S.N. Jha, President - The appellant has filed application for modification of the order dated 30-1-2008 by which hearing of the appeal was adjourned sine die in view of pendency of the appeal in the case of Grasim Industries. In the High Court of Madhya Pradesh. ....
X X X X Extracts X X X X
X X X X Extracts X X X X
....ntrary, it is open to the Tribunal, or for that matter any Court, to hear the appeal etc., as the case may be. However, in such matters two views can always be taken. In the facts of the present case, the Tribunal took the view that hearing may be postponed till decision of the Madhya Pradesh High Court. It is not in dispute that the subject-matter of the Tribunal's order dated 2-2-2007 (supra) gi....
TaxTMI