2003 (4) TMI 268

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

.... for the Respondent. [Order]. - By this writ petition, an employee of one M/s. Shankar Clearing and Forwarding Agency, a custom house agent (In short "CHA"), seeks to challenge an order dated 21 May 2001, issued by the Deputy Commissioner (Policy), informing the CHA that the G-Card issued in favour of its employee, the petitioner herein, has been cancelled with immediate effect. The CHA has bee....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....unal, vide order dated 2 July 2001, reduced the same to Rs. 25,000/-, which was accepted by counsel for the petitioner to be quite reasonable. 4. It seems that in the meanwhile the impugned letter was issued to the employer of the petitioner. 5. We have heard learned counsel for the parties. It is strenuously urged by learned counsel for the petitioner that before directing his employer to s....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....es of each case. 7. But what is required to be seen is whether a person liable to be directly affected by the proposed administrative action has been given adequate notice to effectively meet the case against him. 8. In the present case, we are of the considered opinion that in view the fact that the impugned order materially affects the rights of the CHA and the petitioner, an opportunity o....