2010 (6) TMI 236
X X X X Extracts X X X X
X X X X Extracts X X X X
.... Shri S. Malhotra, Advocate, for the Respondent. [Order (Oral)]. - Heard the learned Departmental Representative for the applicant and the learned Advocate for the respondents. 2. By the present application, the Department is seeking recall of the final order dated 24th July, 2008 and for reconsideration of the matter on three grounds - firstly, the observation about non-issuance of show c....
X X X X Extracts X X X X
X X X X Extracts X X X X
.... of the observations made in the said order by the Hon'ble High Court and considering the fact that the findings arrived at in the order dated 24th July, 2008 are contrary to the materials on record, the said order needs to be recalled. 4. The learned advocate for the respondents, on the other hand, while placing written submissions on record, submitted that, the entire claim in the matter is f....
X X X X Extracts X X X X
X X X X Extracts X X X X
....lso to be noted that order dated 24th July, 2008 was dictated and pronounced in the open Court in the presence of the Departmental Representative for the appellant and the learned Advocate for the respondents. It is not the case of the applicant that there was any attempt on the part of the Departmental Representative to point out that there was any actual mistake committed by the Tribunal while d....
TaxTMI