2010 (4) TMI 362

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

.... returnable forthwith. Heard finally by consent of parties. The Facts 2. This petition is directed against the order passed by respondent No. 2 - the appellate Tribunal to the extent it directs examination of compliance of Baggage Rules, 1994 in general and explanation to Rule 11 thereof in particular reproduced in para 8 of the impugned order dated 9th October, 2009 passed by the Tribunal with ....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....1998 w.e.f. 2nd January, 1998. 4. On being asked, Mr. R.V. Desai, learned Senior Counsel for the respondent could not challenge the submissions made by learned Counsel for the petitioner, since the Baggage Rules of 1994 have already been superseded by Baggage Rules, 1998. He, thus, submits that the impugned order be modified substituting the Baggage Rules, 1994 with that of Baggage Rules, 1998, w....