2008 (7) TMI 538

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....D BY: Shri N.K. Oza, Advocate, for the Appellant. Shri D.S. Negi, SDR, for the Respondent. [Order per : Archana Wadhwa, Member (J)]. - After hearing both the sides, we find that the original Adjudicating Authority has confirmed interest against the appellant on the principal differential duty amount of Rs. 2,90,250/-. However, the Asst. Commissioner in the impugned order did not quantify the....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

.... the amount required to be deposited by him. Even the stay petition filled before the Tribunal is infructuous in the absence of quantification of his liability towards interest. Similarly stay petition was not required to be filed even before Commissioner (Appeals). Further the directions of Commissioner (Appeals) as contained in his stay order requiring the appellant to deposit 50% of the interes....